Vidulini
Rare of us who watched "Terminator", "Robocop" or similar sci-fi action and tracks where we film the cinema screen for decades obasipaju. But the reality is fast catching up with fiction, and realistically we have today in a number of military conflicts have an open fight against the robot robots or humans. Thousands and thousands of robotic arms are installed as standard inventory of military units. True, still nsmo technological level reached in which a belligerent against the other could only send robots and thus avoided ludske victims. Will the General Staff in the future be able to just fight robots? What are the implications of all their independent use against military targets but also civlinih are just some of the issues that plague modern strategists and technicians, and Psychologists.
Bob Quinn, who is working on military robots for the U.S. Army and the United Kingdom said that the wars robot thing very near future. Wars without human losses could be true but for a decade or two. We add that we hope that our civilization will find the strength to solve problems by democratic means and not through force.
Peter Singer, author of Wired for War Studies says that today's robots and their firing activity today is still largely under the patronage of the human
Patrick Lin, Academician of the United States is responsible for creating so-called. "Ethics of robotic soldiers." He believes it is possible to send only battlefield robots, without people. "Robots will do like a computer on the battlefield only what you teach them, without any negative implications on civilians." This requires great care during their programming. Agrees with him and Dr. Robert Finkelstein of Robotic Technology Inc., "There is no fear that robots will be inhumane to the battlefield, they will only do what they ordered, if their programs incorporate robotic war ethics. After all the human activities and there were occasional incidents and adverse situations. It is in this segment with him disagrees Prof. Noel Sharkey one of the founders of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control. He believes that robots will never be able to possess human-like artificial intelligence. And that is the only man able to evaluate the actual situation on the battlefield situation and respond appropriately. Robots however were "friendly" are just a bunch of silicon and metal with no emotion and soul. Christopher Coker of the London School of Economics, numerous conflicts analyst adds that computers will never truly adopt the "ethics of robotic war." They have not been able, unlike professional soldiers who are.
Bob Quinn, owner of the company for the production of robots for the military says it is important that the soldiers return to their homes safe and sound, and the conflict as doing some robots. Perhaps this is even the highest quality strategies in complex sentences use robots in military conflicts.
Consider briefly two warring parties can not amicably resolve their problems. The Army takes a matter under its jurisdiction. In a large international military training brought hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tons of military hardware. Bulletin starts a war robot. Drone strike down other members of the species warring sides. Hundreds of tanks performed maneuvers and combat action starts much faster than it would be possible to have in their turrets manned. Autonomous Systems missile strike down a number of other rockets, but some of them informed by the experiences of the first, applied the knowledge acquired circumvent and destroy missile defense general staff computer. The remaining hardware in polygon is just easy prey for the enemy to meaningful assault. Before the capitulation yet here and there a robot out of control and awareness to fight almost to destruction. Quickly and it stops. The war is over. Winner of the International Law of the future takes three square kilometers of disputed terrain neighboring country. In our time for something like this is often known to die in the hundreds or thousands of people.
Politicians and generals of both countries for a few days later, together signed the legal documents that legalize the situation on the ground. There was no mobilization, no blood, just a bunch of robotic military hardware destroyed by carefully studying the strategists and technicians in the hope that at some future conflict in the name of their country and take account of the experience of military conflict without sacrifice.
Simultaneously stotinupedeset million kilometers away from Earth, a Russian astronaut American arm robot that is clumsily slipped into a smallish ditch. A few feet away they expect the Chinese and European astronauts prepare for Mars departure by car to the first human dwellings on the red planet. Hopefully that artificial intelligence will never odstići ours. Who knows what might conclude from that. Scenario from Terminator unfortunately looks too realistic.
Marino Tumpić
